CAUTION: EXTERNAL EMAIL As it happens, my afternoon reading today is this OSTP report "Economic Landscape of Federal Public Access Policy<https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/08-2022-OSTP-Public-Access-Congressional-Report.pdf>." Page 14 is peppered with references to UC and has a couple links to the OSC site, which feels a little weird, honestly. But on page 17 they were obviously anticipating Rachael having this question today: "Many studies show that articles published under an open access model would offer greater impact through better readership and generate more citations than subscription-based articles," with three footnotes - 55. Langham-Putrow, A., Bakker, C., & Riegelman, A. (2021). Is the open access citation advantage real? A systematic review of the citation of open access and subscription-based articles. PloS one, 16(6), e0253129. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253129 56. Sotudeh, H., Estakhr, Z. (2018) Sustainability of open access citation advantage: the case of Elsevier’s author-pays hybrid open access journals. Scientometrics 115, 563–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2663-4 57. OACA List. SPARC Europe. (2017, March 4). Retrieved from https://sparceurope.org/what-we-do/openaccess/sparc-europe-open-access-resources/open-access-citation-advantage-service-oaca/oaca-list/; Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., Farley, A., West, J., & Haustein, S. (2018). The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of open access articles. PeerJ, 6. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375 Best, Katie On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 11:21 AM Michael Ladisch <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: Hi Rachael, Frontier’s Policy Labs has a long reference list at the bottom of this post<https://policylabs.frontiersin.org/content/evidence-snapshots-citation-advantage>. As Allegra said, most are discipline specific papers, but some are more general. And here is an article that is not listed https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0253129 Best Michael ------------------------- Michael Ladisch Scholarly Communications Officer University of California Davis, Library 100 North West Quad Davis, CA 95616-5292 [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> (530) 752-6385 From: Scholarly Communications CKG <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> on behalf of Rachael Samberg <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> Reply-To: Rachael Samberg <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> Date: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 at 10:52 AM To: "[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>" <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> Subject: [SCCKG] Leading or recent papers on OA citations or impact Hello, colleagues. Do any of you have at your fingertips some references to leading or recent papers confirming positive effects (either via more citations or greater "impact" however that is measured) for publishing OA? I assure you: I'm not a lazy person. I'm just an exhausted person who would appreciate it if one of her colleagues happened to have a few of these within arm's reach. Thanks, Rachael -- Rachael G. Samberg, J.D., MLIS Scholarly Communication Officer & Program Director Office of Scholarly Communication Services University of California, Berkeley Doe Library, 189 Annex Berkeley, CA 94720-6000 Pronouns: she/her Copyright & Information Policy Guidance<https://www.lib.berkeley.edu/research/scholarly-communication> Updates<https://twitter.com/UCB_ScholComm>