SCHOLARPUB-L Archives

Scholarly Communications CKG

SCHOLARPUB-L@LISTSERV.UCOP.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Taylor, Anneliese" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Taylor, Anneliese
Date:
Tue, 1 Feb 2022 20:09:25 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1157 bytes) , text/html (3001 bytes)
Hi all. When it comes to author rights under the UC OA policies, I frequently relay that authors have the right to deposit their final accepted manuscripts immediately upon publication, without an embargo period. This is often contradicted by author publication agreements, which state that this version may be made available on a website or in the IR after a 12-month or some other embargo period. So I'll refer the author to the OSC FAQ <https://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/for-authors/open-access-policy/policy-faq/#:~:text=My%20publisher%E2%80%99s%20policy%20says%20_____________%2C%20which%20is%20different%20from%20UC%E2%80%99s%20OA%20policies.> that explains this discrepancy.

My question is, how is this right still preserved even when an author signs a publication license agreement contradicting it? I'm thinking about how fair use can be thwarted by the library signing a license agreement that restricts or eliminates what would be fair use without the license. Yet in this case we tell authors that they have the right to share their article beyond what is allowed in a standard publication agreement.

Thanks in advance,
Anneliese


ATOM RSS1 RSS2